According to the source, an oversight inquiry related to former SEC Chair Gary Gensler is referenced, but the provided link is from a prohibited media outlet and cannot be used as a citation under the stated rules. Please provide a verifiable primary source such as an official U.S. congressional letter, House Oversight Committee or Financial Services Committee press release, or an SEC/OIG document, so we can deliver a trading-focused analysis with confirmed facts, including potential regulatory overhang for crypto-exposed equities and price-risk implications for BTC and ETH with proper source citations.

According to @rovercrc, the US SEC will warn crypto firms before initiating tough enforcement actions; source: @rovercrc on X (Sep 15, 2025). The SEC’s established Wells notice process already provides formal pre-enforcement notification to prospective defendants, suggesting any change would be in policy emphasis rather than the underlying procedure; source: U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, Wells Notice guidance. SEC enforcement headlines have historically triggered short-term volatility in BTC and ETH during major cases such as the June 2023 lawsuits against Binance and Coinbase; source: Reuters reporting on SEC actions in June 2023. Traders should monitor the SEC newsroom and litigation releases for confirmation and timing while managing headline risk around U.S. regulatory news windows; source: U.S. SEC Newsroom and Litigation Releases.

According to @iampaulgrewal, a per curiam opinion by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit in a presidential tariff case contains an important ruling on the major questions doctrine (Source: @iampaulgrewal on X, Aug 31, 2025). He states the CAFC’s reasoning rejects what he describes as the Gensler SEC’s attempt to assume Congress’s authority to regulate crypto, indicating potential constraints on the agency without clear legislation (Source: @iampaulgrewal on X, Aug 31, 2025). The post does not include the case name, docket, or any crypto-specific holding, so traders should treat this as a legal interpretation rather than a direct crypto ruling when assessing regulatory risk (Source: @iampaulgrewal on X, Aug 31, 2025).

According to the author, Coinbase's sponsorship of political events, such as a military parade, heightens regulatory risks and undermines crypto's core cypherpunk principles, potentially eroding investor trust and impacting COIN stock and sentiments for BTC and ETH trading. The author cites Ripple's increased lobbying as evidence of industry co-option, warning that such actions could lead to market volatility.